Limited info and experience. But I think the idea behind a Wiki is that it will adapt itself to various needs, and if it doesn't you just bend and fold it.
When we were working on the Tsunami relief effort, we used three different kinds of Wiki engines to get our work going. The main one was the standard MediaWiki, but apart from that we used engines like SocialText and ProcessWiki, which had specific purposes. ProcessWiki for instance is designed to aid process documentation at a later stage. SocialText was extremely functional to allow a high level of interaction between users, and to allocate specific fields to teams.
But apart from this rather non-techie interpretation, I really wouldn't know. But man.. I am in a talkative mood. *Grin*
no subject
When we were working on the Tsunami relief effort, we used three different kinds of Wiki engines to get our work going. The main one was the standard MediaWiki, but apart from that we used engines like SocialText and ProcessWiki, which had specific purposes. ProcessWiki for instance is designed to aid process documentation at a later stage. SocialText was extremely functional to allow a high level of interaction between users, and to allocate specific fields to teams.
But apart from this rather non-techie interpretation, I really wouldn't know. But man.. I am in a talkative mood. *Grin*